GitHub Pages vs Netlify
GitHub Pages vs Netlify compared for European indie developers and small startups. Pricing, EU jurisdiction, GDPR posture — and why Runsite (an EU-registered PaaS in Frankfurt) is worth a look.
// github pages problems → runsite solutions
Sound Familiar?
Every GitHub Pages frustration, solved.
GitHub Pages problem
"GitHub Pages can't run my API"
It serves static files only. No Node.js, no Python, no server-side code. You need a separate backend provider.
Runsite solution
Full-stack hosting, one platform
Deploy your frontend and backend together. Run any language in Docker containers with databases and storage.
GitHub Pages problem
"I can't use it for commercial projects"
GitHub Pages Terms of Service prohibit using it for online businesses, e-commerce, or SaaS.
Runsite solution
Built for production and SaaS
Runsite is designed for production workloads. Deploy commercial apps with full EU compliance.
GitHub Pages problem
"1GB size limit and 100GB bandwidth"
GitHub Pages limits repos to 1GB and bandwidth to 100GB/month. Growing projects hit these limits fast.
Runsite solution
No artificial limits
S3-compatible object storage for assets. Compute and bandwidth that scale with your needs.
// comparison
Runsite vs GitHub Pages
Side-by-side. No marketing fluff — just facts.
| Feature | Runsite | GitHub Pages |
|---|---|---|
| Backend/API Hosting | ✓ Full containers, any language | ✗ Static files only |
| Databases | ✓ Managed PostgreSQL from €5/mo | ✗ Not available |
| Docker Support | ✓ Any Dockerfile | ✗ Not supported |
| GDPR Compliance | ✓ EU entity | ✗ US company (Microsoft) |
| EU Data Centers | ✓ Frankfurt (eu-central) | ✗ Global CDN, no region control |
| Commercial Use | ✓ Allowed | ✗ Explicitly prohibited |
| Static Site Hosting | Via S3 + CDN | ✓ Free, simple |
| Price | Free tier + from €5/mo | ✓ Free (public repos) |
// the other side
What about Netlify?
Netlify excels at static sites. Runsite handles everything else — backend, databases, and full-stack apps on EU servers.
// netlify problems → runsite solutions
Sound Familiar?
Every Netlify frustration, solved.
Netlify problem
"Netlify can't host my backend"
Netlify Functions are limited to 10-second execution. Long-running APIs need a separate hosting provider.
Runsite solution
Persistent containers for any backend
Run long-lived processes, WebSocket servers, background workers — anything Docker can run.
Netlify problem
"No managed databases"
Netlify doesn't offer databases. You need PlanetScale, Supabase, or AWS RDS on top.
Runsite solution
PostgreSQL + Redis included
Managed databases on the same platform. One bill, one dashboard, one support channel.
Netlify problem
"Compute runs in the US"
Netlify Functions run in US regions by default. EU users get higher latency.
Runsite solution
EU-only compute and storage
Everything runs in our Frankfurt (eu-central) region. Sub-20ms for users in DACH and Benelux, single-digit ms within Germany.
// comparison
Runsite vs Netlify
Side-by-side. No marketing fluff — just facts.
| Feature | Runsite | Netlify |
|---|---|---|
| Backend Hosting | ✓ Full containers, any stack | Serverless functions only |
| EU Data Centers | ✓ Frankfurt (eu-central) | ✗ CDN edge only |
| GDPR Compliance | ✓ EU entity, full compliance | ✗ US company |
| Docker Support | ✓ Any Dockerfile | ✗ Not supported |
| Managed Database | ✓ PostgreSQL from €5/mo | ✗ Not available |
| Static Hosting | Via S3 + CDN | ✓ Best-in-class |
| Free Tier | ✓ Permanent | ✓ Generous for static |
// why consider runsite
Beyond GitHub Pages and Netlify
EU PaaS for indie developers and small European startups. One region: Frankfurt.
EU-First Infrastructure
While GitHub Pages and Netlify default to US markets, Runsite is built exclusively for European developers. Frankfurt (eu-central) region, EU entity, EU jurisdiction — no transatlantic transfers.
Real GDPR Compliance
EU-registered entity. Your data is governed by European law. No US jurisdiction, no CLOUD Act.
Predictable Pricing
No per-invocation charges, no surprise bills. Fixed plans with hard spending caps and Telegram alerts.
Common Questions
FAQ
Which is better for EU hosting, GitHub Pages or Netlify?
Neither GitHub Pages nor Netlify is EU-native. Both are US-headquartered and route the majority of traffic through US data centers. For genuine EU data residency, an EU-registered platform like Runsite is the safer choice — a Frankfurt (eu-central) region under EU jurisdiction, no transatlantic transfers, no CLOUD Act exposure.
Which has the better free tier, GitHub Pages or Netlify?
Free tiers on both GitHub Pages and Netlify change frequently and often include compute or bandwidth caps that expire after a trial period. If a permanent free tier matters, evaluate the current terms on each provider before committing.
Is GitHub Pages or Netlify GDPR-compliant?
Both can be configured to support GDPR-compliant workloads via Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), but as US entities they remain subject to the CLOUD Act. For workloads where US jurisdiction is a hard blocker, an EU-headquartered provider is required.
What is the cheapest way to deploy a side project — GitHub Pages or Netlify?
Pricing on both GitHub Pages and Netlify can scale unpredictably with traffic or build minutes. Hard spending caps are not available on either platform. Predictable monthly pricing with usage caps is a differentiator to look for elsewhere.
// explore alternatives
Try the European Alternative
Skip the GitHub Pages vs Netlify debate. Deploy on Runsite.
Start Free on Runsite →